The Effectiveness of Using U-Dictionary Application in Learning English
Abstract
This study uses qualitative research methods to determine the effectiveness of using a u-dictionary application in the learning of English. The data were analyzed using qualitative approaches by the researchers. In this study, questionnaires were employed as research instruments, meetings were held at Google, and interviews were done (open questions). The students of SMK Walisongo Bekasi are the focus of this study. The author takes 20 students using the online dictionary as a sample. The method used by the author is the questionnaire. As a result, it can be concluded that the u-dictionary application can motivate them to learn English because by using this application learning can be easier, faster, and more practical. Meanwhile, students' difficulties in using the u-dictionary application are a bad signal and the lack of funds to fulfill quotas. According to the results of the students' questionnaire, 14 out of 20 students (70%) found the application u-dictionary learning to be highly fascinating. The school should give additional assistance and facilities for instructors and kids to continue using the internet by providing sufficient quota facilities for teachers and other supports, according to policy recommendations. As a result, using the application u-dictionary can help teachers carry out a variety of online teaching and learning activities with their pupils.
Downloads
References
Fithriani, r. (2018). Communicative game-based learning in efl grammar class: suggested activities and students’perception. Jeels (journal of english education and linguistics studies), 5(2), 171–188.
Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together: Cooperative learning in online education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271–289.
Richards, J.C and Renandya,W.A (2002). Methodology in language Teaching: an anthology of current practice. New York: Cambridge.
Hornby. (2006). Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary of Current English. USA: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 483-499.
Fang, W. (2007). Using Google Analytics for improving library website content and design: A case study.
Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together: Cooperative learning in online education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271–289.
Wulandari, D & Cici, H. (2020). The use u-dictionary to increasing the student’ vocabulary. Politeknik Unggul LP3M, Medan.
Hikmah, H. (2020). Analysis of Omission and Addition Errors Found in the Students’ English Text. Nahdlatul Ulama University, Yogyakarta.
Moleong, L. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Bandung: PT. Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Metode penelitian Terapan bidang pendidikan Bandung: Cv.Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, 2015. Metode penelitian pendidikan Pendekatan kuantitatif kualitatif R&D.
Yogyakarta: Alfabeta Bandung.
Ratmini & Dahlia. (2019). Dampak Penggunaan Aplikasi online Dictionary pada
Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Univ PGRI Palembang.
Backer, Elisa. (2010). Using Smarphone and Facebook in A Major Assessment: The Student Experience. E-Jurnal. Australia:University of Ballarat.
Reinders, Hayo. (2010). Twenty Ideas for Using Mobile Phones in the Language.
.png)
22.png)
