Structure Dyadic Method in Improving the Students’ Ability  in Reading Comprehension

Bunyamin Bunyamin; Fatma Sari; Mawaddah Rahanyamtel

doi:10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v9i2.3016

Bunyamin Bunyamin IAIN Sorong
Fatma Sari IAIN Sorong
Mawaddah Rahanyamtel IAIN Sorong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v9i2.3016

Keywords: Structure Dyadic Method, Reading Comprehension, Improvement, Descriptive Text.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the improvement of reading learning outcomes for students of the English Study Program of Tarbiyah Faculty of State Islamic College Sorong, using the Structure Dyadic Method (SDM). This method is a method that only consists of two members in one group (dyad) and its technical implementation is very structured. This research used quantitative methods. There was one problem that was analyzed using statistical analysis, namely the effect of the SDM on the reading ability of the English study program students of Tarbiyah Faculty of State Islamic College of Sorong. Researchers took data using pretest and posttest. The results showed that the use of the SDM in reading comprehension was very good in improving the students' ability to read descriptive texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Astuti, W. (2013). The Effect of Using Partner Reading Strategy toward Reading Fluency at the Second Year Students of Junior High School 1 Sungai Pakning Bengkalis Regency [UIN SUSKA RIAU]. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/10073/1/2013_20131010PBI.pdf
Canto, & Samsudi. (2016). Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Methods Dyadic (SDM) Results of Student Learning SMK TKR Areas of Expertise. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, 16(2), 53–55.
Durriyah, R. (2017). The Effectivenes of Using Small Group Discussion on Students Reading Comprehension of Recount Text [Department of English Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/63391/1/RURY DURRIYAH - FITK.pdf
Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (Fifth). London: Pearson.
Hornby, A. S. (2005). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Huda, M. (2015). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (Sixth Edit). California: SAGE Publications.
Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sharan, S. (2014). The HandBook of Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Istana Media.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning : Teori, Riset dan Praktik (N. Yusron (ed.)). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Tarigan, G. H. (2008). Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung : Aksara.