Students Error Analysis In Using Past Continuous Tense
The purpose of this study was to analyze the students’ error in using past continues tense. The specific objectives were to analyze kinds of error made by the students, to analyze the dominant kind of the students’ error and further more to found out their probably causes. In analyzing data, the writer were giving test to the students to measure the students’ results of their ability and analyze their cases in their study on using past continues tense. The writer took points in every student works, counted it and analyzed. This study were using quantitative descriptive research, in which include counted on analyzed and present the result of study by described on concluding it. The data took from the population of the second grade of SMP Muhammadiyah Aimas were include two class and the writer took the sample from12 (twelve) students from one class. The students of this study had been studied the theory of past continues tense before it. First step in collecting data the writer gave explanation related the theory of past continues tense to follow up the students’ memories in understanding, share the worksheet then explaining the instruction of the test before gave the test. By the observation to the students’ result test, she found four kinds of the students’ error with the frequency: error in addition= 53 (25, 24%), error in omission= 60 (28, 57%), error in miss-formation = 57(27, 14%), and error in miss-ordering = 40 (19, 05%) and the most dominant error was error in omission = 60 (28, 57%). The causes of error were classified based on the theory by John Norris (carelessness, first language interference, and translation), analyzed on the students’ results test.
Azar, Betty Schrampfer. Understanding and Using English Grammar. New Jersey: Prentic Hall, Inc 1989.
Brown, H. Douglas. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Longman, 2000.
Chlaker, Sylvia and Edmund Weiner. The Oxford of English Grammar. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Comrie, Bernard, Aspect:An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect Related Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Dulay, Heidi et al.Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
E. Rebecca. Mastering American English. New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1956.
Ellis, Rod. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Frank, Marcella. Modern English: Exercise for Non Native Speaker, Part1: Parts of Speech. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Inc, 1972.
Garver, B.D. Advanced English Practice Second Edition. Oxford University Press, 1979.
Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman Group, 1983.
Hornby, A.S.Guide to Patterns and Usage in English. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.
Husniati, Siti. An Analysis on Grammatical Errorsin Simple Present Tense on Students’ Descriptive Writing. Skripsi. Jakarta: FITK UIN, 2010.
Lyons, Jhon. Linguistic Semantic an Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995.
Mahmud, Nasrun. English for Muslim University Students. Jakarta, Pusat Bahasa dan Budaya IAIN, 2000.
Norish, Jhon. Language Learners and Their Errors. New York: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1983.
Norrish, J. Language Learning and Their Error. London: Mc.Millan Publisher Ltd, 1987.
Setiawati, Evi. An Analysis on Students’ Difficulties in Learning Simple Past Tense. Skripsi. Jakarta: FITK UIN, 2010.
Sharma, S.K. Error Analysis: why and how. English Teaching Forum, April 1982. Solahidin, Muhamad Al Muharom. An Analysis on the Students’ Difficulties in Using.
Simple Present Tense. Skripsi. Jakarta: FITK UIN, 2011.
Sudijono, Anas. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Swan, Michael. PracticalEnglish Usage. New York:Oxford University Press, 1980.
Thomson, A.J. and A.V. Martinet, A Practical English Grammar: Fourth Edition. New York:Oxford University Press, 1986.
Ur, Penny, Grammar Practice Activities: A Partical Guide for Teacher. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980