Teachers’ Perception on Curriculum Penggerak at SMA Muhammadiyah Al-Amin Kota Sorong

Mersi Axelina

doi:10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v9i2.3870

Mersi Axelina Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v9i2.3870

Keywords: Curriculum Penggerak, Perception

Abstract

This research aims to determine teachers’ perception about the Teachers’ Perception on Curriculum Penggerak at SMA Muhammadiyah Al-Amin Kota Sorong. This research is descriptive qualitative research. Data collection techniques using interview techniques. The population in this research were two female teachers as research subjects. From the result of interviews, it was found that teachers were able to demonstrate their competence in implementing the curriculum penggerak demands and the needs of students. The results of the findings above prove that the curriculum penggerak that is implemented is good enough so that it can be concluded that the curriculum penggerak is quite effective in the learning process at SMA Muhammadiyah Al-Amin Kota Sorong.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberty, H.B. & Alberty, E.J. (1965).Recognizing the highschool Curriculum third edition. New York : The Macmillan Company.

Balitbangbuk No. 028 Tahun 2021 Capaian Pembelajaran PAUD-SDSMP-SMA-SMK-SLB (Kurikulum Baru) Dewey John.1966. The Child and The Curriculum. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago&London. University of Taronto Press.

Imade Yudi Wirawan, 2022 Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Learning Management System (LMS) Di Sekolah Penggerak SMPK 1 Harapan Denpasar https://repo.undiksha.ac.id/9750/

Kemendikbud, 2020. Guru Penggerak. Dan program sekolah penggerak. https://sekolah.penggerak.kemdikbud.go.id/gurupenggerak/.

Kemendikbud. 2020. Naskah Akademik Program Sekolah Penggerak. https://sekolah.penggerak.kemdikbud.go.id/programsekolahpenggerak/und uhan/

Kepmendikbud No. 1177 Tahun 2020 Program Sekolah Penggerak.

Mukhtar. 2013. Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. Jakarta: GP Press Group.

Nasution, S. (2008). Asas-Asas Kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurmadiah, (2018). Manajemen sarana dan prasarana. Jurnal Al-Afkar, VI (1), 41. Program Sekolah Penggerak: KepmendikbudRistek No. 162 Tahun 2021.

Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan. 2020. Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Dan Perbukuan, Balitbang dan Perbukuan Kemendikbud.

Sucik Rahayu, 2021 Hambatan Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Melaksanakan Kurikulum Sekolah Penggerak Dari Sisi Manajemen Waktu Dan Ruang Di Era Pandemi Covid-19 https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/1869
Sugiyono (2011). Metode penelitian kuntitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukirno. (2015) http://eprints.uny.ac.id/id/eprint/12443

Sukmadinata, Nana S. 2002. Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan (1). BANDUNG: REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.
UU RI No. 20 Th.2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Wahyudin, H. 2010. Tinjauan Terhadap Kurikulum. Bandung. Mandiri.

Zamjani. 1, Dkk. 2021. Naskah Akademik Program Sekolah Penggerak. https://penggerak-simpkb.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/portal programsekolahpenggerak/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/10114931/Naskah Akademik-SP.pdf diakses pada tanggal 28 Oktober 2021.